Skip to main content

The Bharat Brief

The Bharat Brief is an independent Indian geopolitics and global affairs platform focused on power, strategy, economy, defence, and international relations. We simplify complex global events and explain how they impact India and the world.

Our coverage includes India’s foreign policy, global power shifts, economic warfare, defence developments, and long-term strategic trends shaping the 21st century. The goal is clarity, context, and facts not noise.

Whether it is geopolitics, diplomacy, trade, or security, The Bharat Brief helps readers understand what is happening, why it matters, and what comes next.

India’s Tax System: Before 2014 vs After 2014 — A Transformation Story


From Complexity to Clarity

Before 2014, India’s taxation system was like a maze full of overlapping laws, paperwork, and confusion. Businesses and citizens often found themselves tangled in multiple tax regimes such as excise duty, VAT, and service tax, each with its own rules and compliance requirements.

Then came a wave of change. After 2014, the Indian government launched a series of sweeping tax reforms that completely reshaped how taxes are collected, paid, and monitored. The biggest among them  the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in 2017 turned India into a single, unified market.

In this article, we’ll explore the difference between the tax system before and after 2014, the reforms introduced, their impact on businesses and citizens, and why India’s tax structure today is considered more transparent and investor-friendly than ever before.



1. The Tax System Before 2014: A Web of Complexity

Before 2014, India followed a fragmented tax structure  both at the central and state levels. The system was divided mainly into direct taxes and indirect taxes.

A. Direct Taxes (Paid Directly to the Government)

1. Income Tax

The income tax system was based on the Income Tax Act of 1961, which continues to exist today. However, before 2014:

  • The tax filing process was largely manual or semi-digital.

  • There was no “new tax regime” or simplified filing structure.

  • Taxpayers relied heavily on exemptions under Section 80C (LIC, PPF, NSC, etc.).

  • The assessment process involved significant human interaction, often leading to corruption or harassment.

2. Corporate Tax

Companies faced some of the highest tax rates in Asia:

  • Domestic companies paid around 30% + surcharge + education cess, totaling nearly 33–34%.

  • Foreign companies were taxed at 40%.

  • Even if a company used exemptions to show zero taxable income, it still had to pay Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) of around 18.5%.

  • The Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) required companies to pay tax on dividends before giving them to shareholders  effectively leading to double taxation.

B. Indirect Taxes (On Goods and Services)

This was where the real chaos existed. India did not have a unified indirect tax system before 2014. Instead, every stage of production and distribution was taxed separately by both central and state governments.

1. Central-Level Taxes:

  • Excise Duty – levied on manufacturing of goods.

  • Service Tax – introduced in 1994; by 2014, the rate was around 12.36%.

  • Customs Duty – applied on imports and exports.

2. State-Level Taxes:

Every business had to file multiple returns  one for excise, another for service tax, and different ones for each state’s VAT system. There was no input credit mechanism across states or between goods and services, leading to a “tax-on-tax” cascading effect that inflated prices.

2. The Pain Points of the Pre-2014 System

  1. Cascading Taxes: No unified structure meant tax was levied on tax.

  2. Corruption and Harassment: Heavy reliance on tax officers for assessments created scope for discretion and bribery.

  3. High Corporate Tax: India’s corporate tax rate was among the highest in Asia, discouraging investment.

  4. Low Tax Base: Only about 3% of Indians paid income tax.

  5. Inter-State Barriers: Each state had its own rules, making inter-state trade difficult.

  6. Poor Ease of Doing Business: Complex compliance discouraged startups and small enterprises.

The need for reform was undeniable.

3. The Tax Reforms After 2014: A Structural Revolution

After 2014, the government embarked on a mission to make India’s tax system simpler, digital, and transparent. Here are the landmark changes:

A. Introduction of GST (2017)

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) replaced multiple indirect taxes like excise, VAT, and service tax. GST unified the Indian market under the slogan “One Nation, One Tax, One Market.”

Key Features of GST:

  • Single tax on the supply of goods and services.

  • Multi-tier rate structure (0%, 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28%).

  • Input Tax Credit (ITC) system removes cascading effect.

  • Common digital portal for registration, filing, and payments.

  • Real-time invoice matching and e-way bills for transparency.

Impact of GST:

  • Reduced logistics costs and tax burden on businesses.

  • Increased formalization of the economy.

  • Boosted government revenue through better compliance.

Despite initial technical glitches and confusion, GST became the most transformative indirect tax reform in independent India.

B. Corporate Tax Cuts (2019)

To attract investment and make Indian industry globally competitive, the government slashed corporate tax rates:

  • 22% for existing companies.

  • 15% for new manufacturing firms (incorporated after October 2019).

  • DDT abolished (2020): Dividends now taxed in the hands of shareholders, avoiding double taxation.

  • MAT reduced to 15%.

This move was widely welcomed by businesses and investors worldwide.

C. Digital and Faceless Tax Administration

The government introduced faceless assessment and e-verification systems to remove human discretion and reduce corruption.

  • Taxpayers no longer need to visit tax offices.

  • Cases are assigned randomly and reviewed online.

  • PAN–Aadhaar linking made tracking easier and reduced tax evasion.

  • Refunds and assessments are now faster and automated.

This marked a significant shift toward trust-based governance  focusing on transparency rather than intimidation.

D. New Income Tax Regime (2020)

Introduced as an optional system, the new regime offers:

  • Lower tax rates but no exemptions or deductions.

  • Simplified structure for salaried taxpayers.

  • Encourages digital, transparent income reporting.

This flexibility allows taxpayers to choose the system that best suits their income structure.


4. Before vs After 2014: A Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureBefore 2014After 2014
System TypeFragmented and manualUnified and digital
Indirect TaxesExcise, VAT, Service Tax, etc.GST (single nationwide tax)
Corporate Tax30% + surcharge (~33%)22% (existing firms), 15% (new manufacturers)
Income TaxManual filing, exemptions-drivenFaceless, digital, optional new regime
TransparencyOfficer-driven, prone to corruptionAI-driven, faceless, traceable
Compliance BurdenMultiple returns and auditsSingle digital interface
Business ImpactComplicated inter-state movementSeamless national market
Black Money & EvasionRampantReduced via digital tracking & Aadhaar-PAN link
Ease of Doing BusinessDifficultImproved  India rose in global rankings
Revenue CollectionFragmentedBroader base and higher compliance


5. The Results: A New Era of Tax Governance

1. Boost to Ease of Doing Business

India’s global ranking improved from 142 (in 2014) to 63 (in 2020) — a direct outcome of simplified taxes and digital governance.

2. Formalization of the Economy

GST and digital payments brought millions of small traders into the formal sector. The tax base expanded, and leakages reduced.

3. Increased Tax Collection

Despite rate cuts, better compliance led to record collections. In FY 2024–25, GST revenues consistently crossed ₹1.6 lakh crore per month.

4. Enhanced Investor Confidence

Lower corporate taxes and a transparent regime attracted FDI inflows and boosted industrial investment.

5. Public Trust and Convenience

Faceless assessment, pre-filled ITRs, and faster refunds improved taxpayer experience. Citizens now find tax filing more predictable and less stressful.

6. Challenges That Still Remain

While post-2014 reforms have improved the system, some challenges persist:

  • GST Complexity: Multiple slabs and frequent changes confuse small businesses.

  • Tax Base Expansion: Only a small percentage of Indians still pay direct taxes.

  • Litigation Backlog: Tax disputes and appeals remain high.

  • Awareness Gap: Many small taxpayers still lack clarity on new systems.

However, these issues are gradually being addressed through policy updates, automation, and awareness programs.


 A Shift from Tax Terror to Tax Transparency

India’s journey from its pre-2014 tax chaos to the post-2014 digital tax ecosystem represents one of the country’s most significant economic transformations.

Before 2014, the system was complex, opaque, and prone to misuse. After 2014, it became transparent, efficient, and technology-driven  with reforms like GST, faceless assessment, and lower corporate tax rates paving the way for sustainable growth.

The change wasn’t easy. Businesses had to adapt, systems had to evolve, and taxpayers had to learn. But the result is clear: India’s taxation is now more transparent, investor-friendly, and future-ready than ever before.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment